VW TDI forum, Audi, Porsche, and Chevy Cruze Diesel forum banner
1 - 9 of 9 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I m starting a new thread on our USA invented (Nov 30, 2021)device coz the former threads makes my head swirl. Latest comments are mixed-up with older comments which are 2 years old.

Our invention is the right stuff for tdi, VW engines. I remember reading about the vw scandal due to dirty emissions from vw engines. It was the worst scandal on ICE and the former head is still on trial at the moment.

Actually, I offered our device to VW but was ignored due to too much pressure.

I offered it again, but still ignored me. Whenever I see the piles of tdi cars on the web, I feel sick. I could have eased VW's suffering. Pls see: nuvinuvi.blogspot.com (videos) to see how our devices 'remove' engine smoke in less than 10 secs.
 

Attachments

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
160 Posts
Hi Nuvi, I looked at the test results on the blogspot but couldn't make much sense of the reported numbers. In simple terms what particular pollutants are you measuring and what percentages on average is each one decreasing?.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
MRB, since u r an auto engineer, i couldn't answer some of your technical questions. I m an electronics technician.

1. The videos showing before n after installation is a big change in itself, considering the emissions of tdi engines.

2. We had our device tested in Australia on an old car with catalytic converter. Since the device prevents the engine to reach its ideal temperature, nox was not completely removed (it should have been 1 but the CC was not able to properly
reach its required temp. the result was 40). CC are rare now due to the price of the catalyst. SCR is common to modern engines. Our technical friends had advised us not to share all the results of the tests. More comments later.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
160 Posts
Lots of em ionization patents out there going back to 70's

There have been enormous amount of studies on fuel ionization (such as Ion current as a feedback signal for ecu control of fuel, etc), Ionization is just one of the many usages in controlling emissions. You can read for hours and hours on this subject on the internet.

By way way I am not an auto engineer. Aircraft mechanic tho yes.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #5 ·
The ionization of fuel w/ magnets require more time to have an effect, it may require u to travel at least 50 to 150 kms or more before it will take effect. Air ionization of air molecules take effect in a few seconds. This is the biggest difference between our method and theirs. One invention used magnets on the air and fuel hose. Besides, magnets have residual magnetism n heavier. Imo, it looks primitive, too.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #6 ·
One of the reasons i m in the perfect platform is that TDI is predominantly VW and our device could 'clear' the smog from an ICE in a few seconds.

I had the ambition to clean diesel engines esp from big ships w/c spew tons of smog on our oceans. It is relatively easy to remove smoke from big ships. Before the covid crisis i started to contact these large vessel companies but b4 they could respond, the unfortunately serious crisis began. More about this later.

For TDI users, i would like u to experience the satisfaction of using a 'clean' engine. Remember, these devices are cheap to produce. Q: Why has no one thought of this tech b4? Is it because of its simplicity? Maybe because ALL had concentrated on the engine's exhaust?(scr, dpf, egr, doc, etc are not cheap).

It is my personal opinion that had VW used our technology, they are free from the crises that is nw upon them.
 

·
Super Moderator
Joined
·
160 Posts
Q: Why has no one thought of this tech b4?
Many have designed basic electromagnetic fuel enhancing devices. That was the point of #4 post. They do seem to work, so I am not saying that yours is not marketable or useful. Just that it is definitely not the first or the only.
Best of luck with it.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
25 Posts
Discussion Starter · #9 ·
Before the covid 19, I was contacting the world's biggest ship companies concerning their smog, (see:nuvinuvi.blogspot.com). I believe that using the nuvitron technology could remove/reduce the smog from these biggest cargo ships. Some entities that have control over these companies have replied, however, the covid 19 occurred and our/their efforts came to an abrupt halt.

I think that had our efforts/plan had been implemented, the dirty smog coming out of these behemoths could have been greatly reduced/stopped. Imagine the smog from cars/buses plus those from large ship engines, greatly reduced or suppressed, what would our city skies look like?

Electrostatic energy is the ONLY effective way, as electromagnetic energy would take a long time to take effect. (The electromagnets/PM would be too heavy) This is my dream and I know that it would take so much time/money/effort to accomplish it.
 
1 - 9 of 9 Posts
Top