If diesels make economic sense, why does government need to "encourage their purchase"? Given that Obama rides around in a 4-ton limo and a 400-ton jet, I don't think he needs to be advocating for fuel efficiency.This probably isn't the place for politics, but Obama has proposed fuel economy levels in the 50+ mpg range. Diesels are already capable of that. Why not encourage their purchase?
I'm happy that I got a $650 tax credit for buying my car...thanks to the "evil" government. Not sure how the fact that the president of the US has a limo and a jet disqualifies him from making good policy for the country.If diesels make economic sense, why does government need to "encourage their purchase"? Given that Obama rides around in a 4-ton limo and a 400-ton jet, I don't think he needs to be advocating for fuel efficiency.
I don't think matters of national security would let him have a choice.If diesels make economic sense, why does government need to "encourage their purchase"? Given that Obama rides around in a 4-ton limo and a 400-ton jet, I don't think he needs to be advocating for fuel efficiency.
Ever heard of Royal Dutch Shell??I believe about 36 percent of u.s. gasoline comes from domestic sources. I don't think Europe has any domestic sources.