It's at idle and I see MAP which is manifold pressure (boost) , not MAF which is the air sensor. You won't see much boost building unless the engine is under load.
So you would be happy if we had a VCDS section on here then?so yes i just bought a full VCDS ! i am very happy.
i didnt knew there was a dedicated section for vcds, cool to know, thanks!!So you would be happy if we had a VCDS section on here then?
Please put your comments in http://www.myturbodiesel.com/forum/f10/vcds-vag-com-section-here-3918/#post19663![]()
well, as long as it gets a real purpose, i mean, that it wont get filled up with non vcds related posts, i would say go ahead !!There isn't but if enough people ask I will add one.
thanks for the suggestions. I am suspecting a leak somewhere...the temperature sensor potentialy in fault is the one right under the vacuum pump right ?Check the coolant temp sensor - it's on the driver's side head on a coolant flange. It will make the car's computer think it's not warmed up.
Yes, the rod length affects boost response completely. It should be checked with a vacuum gauge for when it moves.
Your MAF values look fine. The MAP also looks acceptable but it could be improved. Minor deviation is fine because if you quickly step on the accelerator pedal you get a minor delay in boost response while it builds up. Check the VNT actuator position.
i understand there is limit to respect with this adjustment, i am not expecting magic there, but was wondernig if someone had experience with such low ramp boost and by shortening a litle bit the rod, assuming it is on the "long" side of the adjustment.Adjusting the rod works to the point where it doesn't and makes things worse. Get a hand held vacuum pump and test it yourself to the specs. They're really cheap and worth the investment.