VW TDI forum, Audi, Porsche, and Chevy Cruze Diesel forum banner

1 - 7 of 7 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
23,902 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
So far I've just read the reviews but I finally got a chance to drive the 2010 Audi A3 TDI myself. I've also driven the 2009 Jetta TDI and Audi A3 2.0T gas for comparison. For anyone considering the car....you will like it!:nana2::nana2: Sorry, no pics, you all know what it looks like. If not, google it.

The engine/transmission is the same as the 2010 VW Jetta TDI and Golf TDI so there's nothing surprising there. It's fast compared to older TDI engines and even though it's 140 hp is very close to the 138 hp BHW engine in the mk4 Passat TDI, it feels very different. Power is much smoother and linear. The BHW pulls harder down low but power isn't nearly as smooth. The only transmission is DSG so response is much, much better than the BHW engine which is auto only.

The Jetta TDI w/DSG I drove had an occasional minor delay/hesitation from a stop when you apply the accelerator pedal. This Audi did not.

For whatever reason, the first 1" of brake pedal travel was overly sensitive. Good brake pedal feel is a combination of travel and effort and this was too much. The 2009 VW Jetta TDI DSG didn't have paddle shifters but they are standard on the VW Golf TDIs. The A3 only has paddle shifters on the plus trim. IMHO, this is a bad move on Audi's part since paddle shifter buttons on the steering wheel change the driving experience and Audi is a premium name.

I try to keep opinion out of the FAQ pages like the Audi A3 TDI buying FAQ and delivery checklist :http://www.myturbodiesel.com/1000q_how_to/8p/audiA3tdi_checklist.htm
but the A3 could have been a knockout instead of the decent car it is. Now that I've had a chance to drive the car here is some more opinon.

Pros: slightly nicer trim/materials - you can't see it in pics but it's there.

Side note: I had a chance to see the 2010 Golf and I noticed that while there are some interior improvements, there are also some downgrades. As stated before, the new Golf is better overall but another main goal of the Golf was to build it more efficiently/cheaper. The plastic scuff plate (the piece bordering the trunk/bumper) is much worse compared to the mk4 VWs. You'll never see it until you open the hatchback but it's there and finish/texturing is of much lower quality than I remember. It feels cheaper and thinner. On the bright side, the main interior plastics which you do see are of pretty good quality.

The basic front suspension is the exact same but tuning is different. It felt a tiny big better (smoother yet still controlled) than the Jetta that I tried w/16" wheels, even though this one had 17" wheels. I haven't ridden in a Golf TDI so I can't compare it to the Golf's sport suspension with 17" wheels. It was a dealer demo car and I couldn't wring it out so this was just a first impression on the suspension. I saw a comment elsewhere that the A3 TDI had cast control arms vs. the stamped control arms of the Jetta/Golf. This is not true, only the quattro had cast control arms, the FWD A3 TDI has the same basic design of front suspension. The control arms are the exact same part in FWD A3/Golf/Jetta TDI.

More features in the A3 vs. the Golf/Jetta. Some are standard, some are optional. Power seats, leather, sport suspension, alcantara suede seats, are some of the options.

Cons: even if you don't buy these options, you pay for the opportunity to have them. The price of developing/stocking/training employees to install them, overhead/etc., options is spread among all cars. Choice costs money.

No quattro for the reasons stated in the Audi A3 TDI FAQ and checklist.

The fact that the Jetta sportwagen/Golf wagon TDI exists. The A3 is larger and uses space better than the Golf/Jetta sedan. But the Jetta wagon is bigger, uses the same engine/transmission, the VWs have a much nicer GPS/navigation system, and is cheaper. If the wagon didn't exist the A3 would be the big cargo hatchback and be very unique. Right now it's biggest competitor is the fellow TDI, not the Lexus 250h entry level greenwash hybrid.

The Audi definitely isn't the value leader and the higher the price, the higher the depreciation. I would buy the Audi A3 TDI over the Jetta TDI but the Golf TDI gets the new body this year and the Jetta wagon has more space for less. Of course, my preferences aren't anyone else's preferences, and anyone who does buy the A3 TDI will be very happy. The A3 is supposed to be totally overhauled for model year 2011 or 2012 and it will be interesting to see if they offer the 170 hp TDI engine or quattro. As a total guess I suspect the overhaul may take place in 2012 because the current body is relatively new and because it would be pretty unusual for it to be a 1 year only model.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
226 Posts
Well of course the Audi is not the value leader! That's not their purpose. If you want the best depreciation, buy a total stripper w/no options because options don't really add to the resale.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
371 Posts
170 hp TDI + A3 quattro = dream car (at least for daily driving). Heavier yes, less efficient yes, but I'm willing to compromise ;)
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
118 Posts
Sounds good. Mine will be ready for you in 15 years.
lol, of course! Ever hear of the market for lemons? It uses cars as an example of asymmetric information in a trade. From that, you can guess that those who sell their cars right after getting them probably have lemons that they want to get rid of. Or there is something else that makes them not want the car.

As a basic idea, those who have cherries will hold onto them for 15 years and not sell. Because buyers don't know what is a cherry or a lemon, it drags the whole market down to the average pricing. Therefore, it's worth it to sell if you have a lemon and not worth it to sell if you have a cherry.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1 Posts
A3 TDI Test drive

We drove the A3 TDI Saturday white with black leather, sunroof cold weather package no NAV, Are first impression was the body style was out dated setting next to the Audi A4, A5, I set in the back seat first I had to turn my feet side ways to get them in the floor as the front seat was all the way back but once the front seat was moved forward a few inches all was fine, Getting in the driver’s seat was ok as I had to move the seat forward about 2â€￾ from the full rear position to be comfortable. The steering wheel latch mechanism was a joke I had to reach between my legs to get to it while sitting there very awkward, The German that design this should be shot, It needs to be relocated to the left side of the steering column, We also did not have enough up and down travel for are needs, Next the gas pedal was tight there was only an 1.5â€￾ between the brake pedal and the fire wall that I did not like, I am 6’2â€￾ and after seated I had enough room the seat were very comfortable The interior was of high quality but not fancy the knobs and buttons where very nice Air vents where very high quality best I have seen, there was no Navigation in the test car so I could not test it very stupid on their part people are going to want to see it but it is in the wrong place it sits to low in the dash it needs to be up higher so while driving you could glance over at it and not look down very dangerous, This dash lay out is old and needs to be updated for modern gadgets instead it just pops in the radio place as an afterthought, The Gages were really nice with the multi function display in the center all though we could not get it to work as it just displayed insert phone the salesman did not know anything about it either, In all the interior was nice but not fancy it should stand out some from a VW bur did not, Driving was nice, very tight and quite Power was adequate and the transmission was top notch, The salesman said they have had it for 14 days and that we where the first to drive it I was shocked, It only had 13 mile on it when we drove it and we both put 5 mile a piece on it so I guess he was telling the truth, He all so said that this car is for sale and could buy it to day but they where obligated to have it for test drives for 60 days and would make a good deal on it, In all it is a good car with a outdated body style and few quirks inside, It just did not pass are test in the looks department we will pass it up and wait for and updated body style or an A3 sedan or a A4 TDI, The high MPG is what's luring us to this car but it just is not worth it. After that My wife wanted to look at some car that had just been reworked and had just come out for 2010 A Buick Lacrosse so we drove down the block and took a look Holy crap have any of you seen this thing Body styling was outstanding and the interior styling was out of this world and very high quality and fancy blows Audi’s away comes in FWD and All wheel drive both 27MPG and later with 30 MPG and a 35MPG Hybrid in 2011, We will see what happens with this car as there is nothing we dislike other then the MPG, And We have found in the past if you absolutely don’t like everything about a car then don’t buy .
 
1 - 7 of 7 Posts
Top